Scapple and scrivener integration9/6/2023 ![]() ![]() It’s wonderful to have that now available for general writing. The switchable workspace layout feature alone is something you tend only to find in specialized, vertical market software. Buying Scrivener 3 is a no-brainer on top of that-the price is a bargain for what you get, and Tinderbox is not a great writing environment, whereas Scriv3 truly is fantastic for that. For any complex, novel research project that involves teasing out unknown relationships between material/ideas, there still aren’t any really serious commercial alternatives to Tinderbox. Tinderbox integrates well with both (though there are some bugs with Scriv3 support right now), so we have quite an embarrassment of riches. ![]() There is also a lot more overlap with DevonThink as well. The bookmark in Scrivener is simple drag and drop.īecause they’ve significantly improved metadata handling and filtering in Scrivener 3, there are definitely certain classes of tasks where Scrivener now overlaps much more closely with Tinderbox than it used to. The steps in Devonthink are more extended and a bit cumbersome:Ī) add project tags on the selected filesī) setup a smart search to collect the files with those tagsĬ) remove the tags whenever the file finished its task function to simply I was using Tagging in combination with Smart searches in Devonthink to do a similar collection of project files. If you are to publish in a word or similar format, I agree with you, Scrivener is definitely be very useful for formatting.īut, I find the Bookmark feature pretty attractive. As such, sending some short drafts from Tinderbox to TexStudio has been my main workflow for a long time now. I do the formatting in the Latex (Texstudio). I am not going to do all the heading, compiling stuff inside Scrivener. There is certain overlap between the two systems (Scrivener+Scapple vs Tinderbox).įor me, one reason I don’t find Scrivener that much attractive is mainly due to my own setup: I have to publish my work using Latex ultimately. With the addition of Scapple, they might actually thinking of making the Scrivener environment a full system from mapping ideas to drafting and publishing. I totally agree on your characterization of Tinderbox.Īs you said, Scrivener has now spread its area. >its package, certainly does not aspire to what Tinderbox can do in that Whereas Scrivener, although it too has an outliner as part of >to identify “emergent structure” (which sounds faintly sinister, but >than that, being versatile, nuanced and “smart”, and capable of helping >concept map, prior to writing long-form. >those of Tinderbox - and Tinderbox can certainly be used an outliner or >course, outliners and concept maps or mindmaps have similar purposes to >thoughts and ideas and establishing the relationships between them. I like to think of it as a sophisticated means of arranging >ever! The definitions of what Tinderbox actually is are several and >In contrast, I wouldn’t want to try to write long-form in Tinderbox. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |